Sylvia: Barking Up The Wrong Tree

Sylvia, A.R. Gurney’s comedy, explores the twists and turns of pet ownership and interpersonal relationships. When Greg, a middle-aged city man, brings home a stray dog he found at the park wearing nothing more than a tag that reads, “Sylvia,” it quickly begins to cause a rift in Greg’s relationship with his wife, Kate. Greg soon realizes that he has bigger problems than housebreaking. The play’s main theme encompasses struggles with relationships and communication, yet Gurney presents and provokes these struggles via indirect approaches.

The character of Sylvia is a dog embodied as a human, and played by an actor. Sylvia verbally communicates with the people around her, and projects an eager, high-strung personality. As stated in the New York Times review of the 2015 Broadway production of Sylvia, “Mr. Gurney’s comedy rests on this critter acting almost as human as the humans, conversing easily with both the man who dotes on her and the woman who eyes her with frank distaste” (Isherwood). However, Sylvia’s character can be interpreted in one of two ways: either as a prominent character inhabiting her own personality and opinions, or as a causation driving a rift between Greg and Kate. Sylvia’s scripted dialogue includes a large portion of profanity, which can come across either as a character with a strong-willed personality or as an audience shocker and another reason for Kate’s distaste of the dog. This was also referenced in the 2015 New York Times review, the reviewer noting, “Among its few distinctions, ‘Sylvia’ has to be the only one of the gentlemanly Mr. Gurney’s many plays that regularly descends to such vulgarity, which is one reason I am not particularly partial to it” (Isherwood). Although Sylvia does engulf her own personality and character traits, her lack of housebreaking, flea infestation, and chewing habit serve to act as more of a plot-driving causation for Greg and Kate, the two main characters.

Early on, the play demonstrates that Kate is completely against keeping Sylvia as a pet, telling her husband, “N period. O period. Not in New York. Not at this stage of our lives. No” (1.1). Yet, the disagreements which seemed to center on Sylvia throughout the play were likely marital problems which had been present prior to the dog entering their life, and were simply exacerbated by the presence of Sylvia. For example, it appears from the start of the show that Greg was ready to leave his job while Kate was diving head-first into her career, creating different directions in life. Yet, both Greg and Kate longed for a deeper emotional connection to something; Kate used her career while Greg found Sylvia. In reality, they needed a connection with each other. Kate’s jealousy of Sylvia indicates that her marriage had been rocky for possibly quite some time before Sylvia had been factored into their relationship. Kate tells her psychologist, Leslie, as she tries to explain her husband’s love for Sylvia, “No, this is different, Leslie. Even when we were first married, he never looked at me the way he looks at Sylvia” (2.1). Possibly, Gurney chose to include Sylvia’s spay in act II, scene I as symbolism for the lack of intimacy between Greg and Kate as their disagreements over Sylvia drive the couple further apart.

The first time the audience see’s any hint of an acceptance or liking towards Sylvia occurs in act II, after Greg has made the decision to rehome Sylvia to save his marriage. Kate returns from work early to say goodbye to Sylvia before Greg drives her to her new home, and Kate begins to show feelings of concern that Sylvia will be leaving without her favorite toy in tow. It is this moment, which Kate searches for Sylvia’s lost little red ball, that seems to be a turning point in Greg and Kate’s relationship. This also occurs at the same time Greg reluctantly agreed to give up his beloved dog, which demonstrated to his wife that his marriage was, indeed, a priority to him. Sylvia’s return of Kate’s possessions prior to departing was symbolic in that it displayed that the couple had the ability to live together peacefully with Sylvia, and resolve their differences. Kate and Greg’s opposite feelings towards Sylvia did not change; what did change, was the ability to understand and accommodate each other’s needs and feelings. However, it is because of Sylvia that Greg and Kate learn to respect each other’s feelings and resolve their differences, as Greg’s conversations with Sylvia slowly diminished over time with Kate lovingly hinting to Greg at the end of the play, “Maybe it was because you and I talked more” (2.1).

Although the disagreements that had occurred between Greg and Kate revolved around Sylvia as their central dispute, their conflicts were likely caused by deeper communication issues within their relationship that had been brewing for quite some time. The question then lingers, if Sylvia hadn’t made her way into Greg and Kate’s home, would their marriage have still been salvaged?

Works Cited

Gurney, A.R. Sylvia. Dramatist Play Service, 1996.

Isherwood, Charles. “Review: ‘Sylvia,’ in Which a Man Loves a Dog Too Much.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/28/theater/review-sylvia-in-which-a-man-loves-a-dog-too-much.html. 27 Oct. 2015.

Advertisement

It’s A Dog’s Life

Sylvia, by A.R. Gurney, is a comedy exploring the twists and turns of pet ownership and interpersonal relationships. When Greg (Bob Smith), a middle-aged city man, brings home a stray dog he found at the park wearing nothing more than a tag that reads, “Sylvia” (Elisabeth Bokhoven), it quickly begins to cause a rift in Greg’s relationship with his wife, Kate (Jane Lucas). Greg soon realizes that he has bigger problems than housebreaking.

It is immediately evident that Kate is completely against keeping Sylvia as a pet, telling her husband, “N period. O period. Not in New York. Not at this stage of our lives. No” (1.1). Yet, the disagreements which seemed to center around Sylvia throughout the play were likely marital problems which had been present prior to the dog entering their life, and were simply exacerbated by the presence of Sylvia. For example, it appears from the start of the show that Greg was ready to leave his job while Kate was diving head-first into her career, creating different directions in life. Kate’s jealousy of Sylvia indicates that her marriage had been rocky for possibly quite some time before Sylvia had been factored into their relationship. Kate tells her psychologist, Leslie (Joshua Yoder) as she tries to explain her husband’s love for Sylvia, “No, this is different, Leslie. Even when we were first married, he never looked at me the way he looks at Sylvia” (2.1). It is also possible that A.R. Gurney had included Sylvia’s spay in act II, scene I as symbolism for the lack of intimacy between Greg and Kate as their disagreements over Sylvia drive the couple further apart. However, it is because of Sylvia that Greg and Kate learn to respect each other’s feelings and resolve their differences, as Greg’s conversations with Sylvia slowly diminished over time with Kate lovingly hinting to Greg at the end of the play, “Maybe it was because you and I talked more” (2.1).

Although the disagreements that had occurred between Greg and Kate revolved around Sylvia as their central dispute, their conflicts were likely caused by deeper communication issues within their relationship that had been brewing for quite some time. The question then lingers, if Sylvia hadn’t made her way into Greg and Kate’s home, would their marriage have still been salvaged.

Work Cited

Gurney, A.R. Sylvia. Dramatist Play Service, 1996.

Sylvia. By A.R. Gurney. Dir. by Benjamin Thomas-Reid. Perf. by Bob Smith, Elisabeth       Bokhoven, Jane Lucas, and Joshua Yoder. Hickory Community Theatre, Hickory, NC. 18   November, 2017.

Our Town’s Non-Human Citizens

At LRU’s production of Our Town, by Thornton Wilder, the director (Dr. Lindsay Weitkamp) incorporated a pre-show, where the cast was seen in character, taking part in their usual day-to-day town activities and chores as the audience was being seated. At one point during the rehearsal process, I had asked the director about the possibility of incorporating my service dog, “Casey,” into the pre-show with us. After all, I was playing the role of Rebecca Gibbs, and my job was to run around and play with the two other town children, Wally Webb (Quentin Heller-Lee) and Joe Crowell (Sophie Heller-Lee), so wouldn’t it make sense to see a couple kids in the early 1900’s running around with a dog in tow? The director agreed to try this for a rehearsal; Casey behaved beautifully and the scene looked adorable, so we kept the dog.

Our Town is a story which follows two 1900’s high school sweethearts, Emily (Callie Cope) and George (Jack Verner), through their lives alongside various other town citizens in their small, tight-knit community of Grover’s Corners, NH, as they navigate love, marriage, and eventually, death. The play was written intentionally with pantomiming replacing the use of props, and very minimal set pieces.

Although a live dog was used in the pre-show of this particular production, Wilder did write the role of “Bessie” into the script, the stubborn horse of the town milkman, Howie Newsome. Additionally, he wrote dialogue and stage directions which incorporate other animals, such a character feeding chickens, another character putting down a dish for a dog, and the sound of chirping crickets at night. During act I, when Emily’s mother, Mrs. Webb (Ashton Pesterfield), is asked to give her opinion regarding culture and love of beauty in Grover’s Corners, she comments, “But maybe this is the place to tell you that we’ve got a lot of pleasures of a kind here: we like the sun comin’ up over the mountain in the morning, and we all notice a good deal about the birds. We pay a lot of attention to them” (1.1). To Wilder, it seems as though the incorporation of animals within the town was an important part of life.

In Act II, there is a flashback to the moment when George and Emily awkwardly have their first discussion about their future plans and relationship with one another. George is considering going away to agriculture school, to which Emily nobly tells him, “But George, maybe it’s very important for you to go and learn all that about – cattle judging and soils and those things… of course, I don’t know” (2.1). The fact that George was considering  going to agriculture school indicates the importance this particular character felt in working with animals and nature.

Most of the cast and crew felt that it made sense to briefly incorporate a dog for the town children to play with during the pre-show, but not during the show, since Wilder had intended for the use of all props or incorporation of live animals to be demonstrated via pantomiming, dialogue, or heard through sound cues only. However, Wilder’s repeated use and mention of animals throughout his show makes it appear evident that living in harmony with nature and non-human life was very important to him and his characters of Grover’s Corners.

Works Cited

Our Town. By Thornton Wilder. Dir. by Lindsay Weitkamp. Perf. by Rev. Andrew   Weisner, Tom Townsend, Sophoe Heller-Lee, Dr. Timothy Goldberg, Ariona Smith,   Ashton Pesterfield, Jack Verner, Heather Osterer, Quentin Heller-Lee, Callie Cope, Sally   Putzer, Chase Fowler, Dr. Sarah A. Nelson, Jovani Valdez, Amber Biecker, Derek   Spencer, Milissia Koncelik, Mason Fowler, Brandon Lee, Clay James. LR Playmakers,   Lenoir Rhyne University, Hickory, NC. 9-12 November, 2017.

Wilder, Thornton. Our Town. Samuel French, 1938.

The Foreigner: Mind Over Matters

The Foreigner, by Larry Shue, is a comedy about a shy young man, Charlie, who is taken to a fishing lodge in Georgia by his friend, Froggy, in an attempt to take Charlie’s mind off of some relationship upheaval with his wife, who had recently fallen ill, back home. Unfortunately, Charlie is terrified of the prospect of having to talk to the other people at the lodge, so his friend tells the lodge owner that Charlie is a foreigner, and cannot speak English, in an attempt to diminish attempted conversation from the others at the lodge. Froggy then goes away on military duty for a few days, while Charlie is left at the lodge giving everyone around him the impression that he does not speak their language. Charlie begins to witness conversations take place as if he were invisible, and becomes privy to lots of private information and scheme setups.

A portion of the play’s story line revolves around Ellard, Catherine’s mildly disabled younger brother who cannot have the lodge’s inheritance money unless he proves he is “smart.” As Catherine’s secretly manipulative fiance, David, tells his friend, Owen (who is also one of the villains in the story) about Ellard, “Theoretically, he’s supposed to receive half of the family money. But, only if Catherine should decide he’s intelligent enough,” to which Owen sneers, “Well, that don’t seem too likely, does it?” (1.1, 23). Since Charlie takes it upon himself to give Ellard’s family the impression that he is intelligent in an attempt to destroy David and Owen’s evil scheme to inherit the money, the question still lingers if Ellard really is smart enough to inherit the money without Catherine’s assistance. In act II, when the family realizes they are in danger, Catherine asks Ellard to help them think of something. “I just gave you a hundred thousand dollars for bein’ smart. You’re the highest-paid mind we got here, now. Think of sump’m” (2.1, 61). However, it is Charlie who comes up with a plan to defeat the villains, and Ellard assists him.

It stands to reason that Ellard will still receive his half of the inheritance money, as Catherine had come to understand the dangers and twisted thinking which David and Owen had posed to both herself and everyone else at the lodge by the end of the show. However, I believe that playwright Larry Shue was trying to point out the importance of human qualities such as bravery, honesty, and humbleness – all of which Ellard consistently possessed – over the ability to solve a math problem.

Works Cited

Shue, Larry. The Foreigner. Dramatists Play Service, Inc., 1998. https://                                   www.davis.k12.ut.us/cms/lib09/ut01001306/centricity/ domain/7474/         the%20foreigner.pdf              

Creature: To see? Or not to see? THAT is the question…

Lenoir Rhyne University’s fall, 2017 production of Creature, by playwright Heidi Schreck, is a story which takes place in the year 1401, and delves into the mind Margery, a young woman who claims to see biblical visions of Jesus Christ and the devil. After encountering these visions, Margery (Elisabeth Bokhoven) goes on a quest towards sainthood, looking to priest Father Thomas (Benjamin Thomas-Reid)  for help, while she leaves her marriage and newborn baby behind. However, some people of the town remain skeptical of Margery’s visions, and she faces a potential death sentence for speaking openly.

The central question that remains for the audience throughout the entire show is whether or not Margery’s visions are real, or a symptom of mental instability. Margery confides in Father Thomas, though the priest seems somewhat hesitant to help her. In scene 5, Margery begs him for help, telling him that she is no longer allowed in one of the other churches in town because she weeps during the sermons. When asked why she weeps, she replies, “Because my heart is burning up. And I want to put out the fire by flinging myself upon on the beautiul things that God has made” (Schreck, 26). This reply is both deep and nonsensical at the same time, further pushing Margery’s family and friends – as well as the audience – to explore individually whether Margery is truly a messenger of God or mentally unstable. To further complicate matters, in scene 9, Margery sees a vision of a living hazelnut, left over from an earlier scene in which a bowl of hazelnuts is thrown at the wall. Additionally, it is interesting to note that while Margery’s interactions with the devil, Asmodeus (Corey Smith) are shown live on stage, Schreck refrains from showing any live visions of Jesus Christ in purple robes in the stage blocking, which Margery is incredibly adamant about having seen.

The plot line surrounding the play, Creature, is essentially left up to individual interpretation, based on personal beliefs and experiences. Did Margery really see Jesus Christ or the devil? There is no right or wrong answer, and unless you ask Heidi Schreck what her intentions were whilst writing this play, then there never will be any right or wrong answer.

 Works Cited.

      Creature. By Heidi Schreck. Directed by Elisabeth Bokhoven. Performed by Elisabeth Bokhoven (Margery), Chase Fowler (John), Benjamin Thomas-Reid (Father Thomas), Callie Cope (Nurse), Milissia Koncelik (Julianna), and Corey Smith (Asmodeus/Jacob).

LR Playmakers, Lenoir Rhyne University, Hickory, NC. 21-24 September, 2017.

Schreck, Heidi. Creature. Samuel French Inc, 2011.

Heather & Casey: “Do Not Separate Dog From Handler”

When people see me around campus, I usually have an apricot colored Goldendoodle by my side. Sometimes she is wearing her blue vest marked, “Service dog,” indicating that she is on duty, and other times she can be seen off duty, fetching sticks in the field in front of the theatre building. “Casey” is my [autism] service dog. She is also a 9-month-old puppy and at home, a family pet.

Heather_Casey_InBookstore

I am new to the world of service dog handlers, so I often learn as I encounter new situations with Casey by my side. There are small occurances throughout daily life, which the normal public often does not think about, in navigating life with a service dog; one of my first questions was, “During bathroom breaks, should I take my dog in the stall with me?” (for those of you who are wondering, the answer is “yes,” always take your dog with you, unless you are with a trusted friend or family member who is able to hold the dog for you).

Casey makes the challenges and frustrations of living with autism a little easier for me. She is my connection to the neurotypical world. There is a healthy codependence that exists between us – she needs to have as much trust in me as I do in her. Above all, there is an inseparable bond between us that will last a lifetime.

Heather_Casey_InClass